Septic fields now face tighter rules

New septic field regulations aimed at protecting the province’s waterways are now in force throughout Manitoba.
But a person who installs septic fields says the new changes won’t surprise property owners looking at installing a septic system.
Conservation Minister Stan Struthers on Monday made official “aggressive new rules governing human sewage”.
“Manitoba recognize it is time to move beyond outdated and unsustainable ways of dealing with sewage in favour of more responsible methods,” Struthers said in a statement.
“I am pleased to announce that will help protect human health and the environment.”
The new regulations include requiring a two-acre minimum low size for the installatioin of disposal fields, preventing septic fields in a number of sensitive areas, including Pelican Lake and Rock Lake, as well as Crown land cottage developments, provincial parks and a three-kilometre-wide corridor along the Red River between Winnipeg and Selkirk, banning existing sewage ejectors when a property is sold and forcing homeowners to hook up to municipal collection systems in serviced areas.
The new regulation were first posted for public comment in January and public consultations went on into May.
Dave Futros, of Farm-Rite Plumbing and Excavation Ltd., a company that installs septic systems in areas including West and East St. Paul and the Rural Municipality of Springfield, said he’s been telling people for months about the septic field changes coming down the pipe.
Futros said on Monday that the province has met with representatives in his profession for months to keep them abreast of what was happening.
“It was supposed to be passed in June. All the contractors have been made aware. ”

New septic field regulations aimed at protecting the province’s waterways are now in force throughout Manitoba.

But a person who installs septic fields says the new changes won’t surprise property owners looking at installing a septic system.

Conservation Minister Stan Struthers on Monday made official “aggressive new rules governing human sewage”.

“Manitoba recognize it is time to move beyond outdated and unsustainable ways of dealing with sewage in favour of more responsible methods,” Struthers said in a statement.

“I am pleased to announce that will help protect human health and the environment.”

The new regulations include requiring a two-acre minimum low size for the installatioin of disposal fields, preventing septic fields in a number of sensitive areas, including Pelican Lake and Rock Lake, as well as Crown land cottage developments, provincial parks and a three-kilometre-wide corridor along the Red River between Winnipeg and Selkirk, banning existing sewage ejectors when a property is sold and forcing homeowners to hook up to municipal collection systems in serviced areas.

The new regulation were first posted for public comment in January and public consultations went on into May.

Dave Futros, of Farm-Rite Plumbing and Excavation Ltd., a company that installs septic systems in areas including West and East St. Paul and the Rural Municipality of Springfield, said he’s been telling people for months about the septic field changes coming down the pipe.

Futros said on Monday that the province has met with representatives in his profession for months to keep them abreast of what was happening.

“It was supposed to be passed in June. All the contractors have been made aware. ”

Manitoba Auto Dealers

Surrey Coquitlam vancouver Victoria Auto Financing Interest Rates

www.crossfireconsulting.net

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

  • Fishing the Big One in Lake Tahoe Lake Tahoe offers plenty of exceptional scenery making it worth the fishing trip price just to see the dawn as it tints the Sierras in lovely gold. Fishing is not very productive here since the...
  • What is computer science? Despite earning a BSEE from a school that combines EE & CS curricula, I don't know much about CS. After being invited to join the software team at work I decided I should find out....
  • Fishing Report: September 25, 2009 Here is a look at what is happening this week in Bay Area fishing. Freshwater Lake Fishing - The boat traffic has been light in Berryessa, but for those who are getting out there, there...
  • How to Fix a Septic System Make Your Sluggish Septic System Good as New! If you live in a rural or unincorporated area, there's a good chance your home is equipped with a septic system. Why? Because your home produces kitchen...
  • Lake Property Vacation Homes in Kentucky When it comes to owning lake front property for retirement or as a vacation home, Kentucky is a hidden gem.  I say this based on our personal experience.  We have owned our lake house in...

Stratham makes it easier for property owners to pay taxes

STRATHAM — The Board of Selectmen voted this week to accept payment on taxes early, a practice previous boards considered and rejected.
“I don’t think we had the technological sophistication we have now in our tax collector’s office,” said Town Administrator Paul Deschaine, about why the proposal was rejected by previous boards.
“It’s something that I’ve wanted to offer to taxpayers for a long time,” said Tax Collector and Town Clerk Joyce Charbonneau. She said she routinely receives calls from residents asking if they can pre-pay their taxes.
The program is already up and running, and had two people pre-pay portions of their tax bills on Tuesday, Oct. 6, the day after selectmen voted it into practice.
“We’ve had a lot of anxious calls in the past few months from people worried that the tax bills are going up,” she said.
Charbonneau said, as she tells the callers, she can’t guess what the tax rate will do this year, but she said it will probably be coming out about a month late. “People are worried and some people want to put a little away and whittle down the tax bill so they aren’t hit with the full cost all at once,” she said.
Charbonneau said people can set up a schedule with her, or just stop by at their leisure, but that she would not be calling or sending out reminders to people if they don’t stick to their schedule.
“Anything that we can do to make things a little easier for people, particularly in this economy, is a good thing,” she said. “They can come in every month or every week— or every day if they want and they can pre-pay as much as they want.”
At this point, residents can pre-pay toward their tax bill as much as they want and at the end of the year if there is a remaining balance it will be refunded to them. In the beginning of the year, residents can pre-pay toward the July tax bill and any extra funds can be refunded or applied toward the December tax bill.
Other towns in the area use systems of pre-payment. “I’ve spoken with some of them and they said it is no problem,” she said. “There is no additional administrative burden.”
There was some discussion about the possibility of taking payments as far as the state law allows, two years ahead of when the taxes are due.
“I don’t see a problem with letting people pay two years in advance,” Selectman David Canada said. “But, I also don’t see a problem in letting you crawl before you run,” he told Charbonneau, pointing out that if she decided later to extend how far people could pay in advance, it would not require approval from the Board of Selectmen.
“As always, Joyce is out there to help the customers,” Canada said.
http://www.seacoastonline.com/articles/20091009-NEWS-910090315

STRATHAM — The Board of Selectmen voted this week to accept payment on taxes early, a practice previous boards considered and rejected.

“I don’t think we had the technological sophistication we have now in our tax collector’s office,” said Town Administrator Paul Deschaine, about why the proposal was rejected by previous boards.

“It’s something that I’ve wanted to offer to taxpayers for a long time,” said Tax Collector and Town Clerk Joyce Charbonneau. She said she routinely receives calls from residents asking if they can pre-pay their taxes.

The program is already up and running, and had two people pre-pay portions of their tax bills on Tuesday, Oct. 6, the day after selectmen voted it into practice.

“We’ve had a lot of anxious calls in the past few months from people worried that the tax bills are going up,” she said.

Charbonneau said, as she tells the callers, she can’t guess what the tax rate will do this year, but she said it will probably be coming out about a month late. “People are worried and some people want to put a little away and whittle down the tax bill so they aren’t hit with the full cost all at once,” she said.

Charbonneau said people can set up a schedule with her, or just stop by at their leisure, but that she would not be calling or sending out reminders to people if they don’t stick to their schedule.

“Anything that we can do to make things a little easier for people, particularly in this economy, is a good thing,” she said. “They can come in every month or every week— or every day if they want and they can pre-pay as much as they want.”

At this point, residents can pre-pay toward their tax bill as much as they want and at the end of the year if there is a remaining balance it will be refunded to them. In the beginning of the year, residents can pre-pay toward the July tax bill and any extra funds can be refunded or applied toward the December tax bill.

Other towns in the area use systems of pre-payment. “I’ve spoken with some of them and they said it is no problem,” she said. “There is no additional administrative burden.”

There was some discussion about the possibility of taking payments as far as the state law allows, two years ahead of when the taxes are due.

“I don’t see a problem with letting people pay two years in advance,” Selectman David Canada said. “But, I also don’t see a problem in letting you crawl before you run,” he told Charbonneau, pointing out that if she decided later to extend how far people could pay in advance, it would not require approval from the Board of Selectmen.

“As always, Joyce is out there to help the customers,” Canada said.

http://www.seacoastonline.com/articles/20091009-NEWS-910090315

Vancouver CraigList Auto Financing Interest Rates

www.crossfireconsulting.net

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • How Will You Spend Your $13 Stimulus This Week? As you might have guessed, this post is about the individual tax credit component of the stimulus plan that President Obama signed yesterday.  It will increase the size of the average weekly paycheck (for those...
  • All Variable Annuities are Not Created Equal Every now and then, I see an article that slams an entire industry or writes off an entire line of products without examining the potential benefits from every possible angle. Earlier this week, MSN Money's...
  • Texas Estate Planning is Worth the Time Everyone should plan for what happens to their possessions after their death. Those with valuable things should take care to spell out the disposition of their valuables after they die. The most effective way to...
  • Health (insurance) care reform Bill signed [/caption] President Obama signs the Healthcare reform Bill. There's a lot of  controversy with this bill. Conservatives fear it will bankrupt the nation and fear being forced to buy health insurance. Outside of preventing insurance...
  • Introduction to Mortgages pt 2 of 5 This is part two in a five part series on what you need to know about mortgages before you buy a home. The housing market is an interesting beast, because it comes and goes, rises...

WV unhappy with TransLink taxation level

District of West Vancouver residents overpay for what they get in public transportation.

That was council’s reaction Monday to TransLink’s proposal for bridging a $130-$450-million fiscal shortfall.

“It looks to me,” Coun. Michael Lewis said, “that in five to seven years, the average resident in West Vancouver is going to be paying more each year to Metro Vancouver and TransLink than they’re paying to the district.”

Coun. Shannon Walker pointed out that the average West Vancouver homeowner pays around $500 in property taxes to TransLink each year on a $1.4-million assessed home, but doesn’t have access to big infrastructure projects like the Canada Line and Evergreen Line.

“We have no rapid transit and no plans to develop it,” said Coun. Michael Smith. “We . . . pay all these taxes, and we’re not getting anything from it.”

Revenue sources for TransLink are defined by legislation, said Brian Mills, director of strategic planning and policy with TransLink, in a presentation on TransLink’s updated 10-year strategic plan. Revenue is presently accrued through fuel taxes, parking sales tax, transit fares, property tax, hydro levy, real estate, advertising and provincial and federal governments.

TransLink would need to raise $450 million a year in revenue investment over the next 10 years to support a program that would see infrastructure improvements and an expansion of present transit services.

That would mean that additional revenue sources outside of those available to TransLink under current legislation would be necessary, Mills said. One of those proposed additional funding sources is the controversial transportation improvement fee, which could be levied as a $65-$165 fee on vehicles based on fuel efficiency or a $120 flat fee.

“If additional revenue is not made available, TransLink would need to cut back on current services,” Mills added. A “drastic cuts” scenario where no additional funding is provided would mean a “40 per cent reduction in bus service to balance the books.”

West Vancouver’s total piece of the TransLink tax-burden pie is larger than that of the majority of municipalities, Walker said in a phone interview. This year, West Vancouver doled out $8.9 million to TransLink, Walker said, up from $400,000 in 1998.

“We pay more because our properties are assessed that much higher,” she added. “We’re basically paying double what everyone else is paying.”

West Vancouver council voted in favour of the funding stabilization plan. About $130 million per year would need to be raised, but transit service hours would be maintained at 2009 levels and service cuts would be minimized.

A 50 per cent cut to cycling facility maintenance funding is, however, listed under that funding scenario.

Mayor Pam Goldsmith-Jones said that the mayors’ council, which she said has too little authority to sway the direction of transit planning at the moment, has argued for a better governance structure that takes a closer look at the connection between roads, bridges and cycling.

http://www2.canada.com/northshorenews/news/story.html?id=5878fa3b-3946-4639-8cd9-c30868802c34

Property Tax Assessments to be Mailed Soon

Wpg Auto Dealer

www.crossfireconsulting.net

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • Tennis Preview: The West Virginia Open Final preparations are currently being made for the West Virginia Open, the 48th of its kind, which is slated to begin on July 22 and last until July 26, and will be held at the...
  • Obama's $787 Billion Economic Stimulus Plan: The Least You Need To Know President Obama signed a modified economic stimulus bill into law yesterday, a plan with a $787 billion price tag.  The purpose of this article isn't to debate the merits of the stimulus plan, however, but...
  • Athlete Profile: Dan Wakeham The first male Olympic competitor on snowboard in Britain, Dan Wakeham has announced that he will be retiring from the world cup circuit. He has recently announced that following seven years with the British snowboarding...
  • How Aggressive Should A 22 Year Old Be With Retirement Funds? Woohoo! I fully funded my 2009 Roth IRA yesterday after taking $3,000 out of savings and sticking it in my Vanguard account. The great thing about that is that I now am eligible for many...
  • Retirement Accounts Explained We hear a lot about retirement accounts, but I wanted to spend today's post explaining the different types of accounts. Traditional IRA - Individual Retirement Account Individuals can set up these accounts and invest for...

Top court quashes appeals of Quebec municipal taxpayers

OTTAWA – The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeals Thursday of three municipal taxpayers who wanted to launch class-action lawsuits to force city hall to reimburse millions of dollars that it collected in taxes.
By a 5-4 margin, the court sided with the lower courts in Quebec by rejecting the cases of Michel Marcotte, Usinage Pouliot Inc., and Jon Breslaw.
The rate payers argued the municipal levy charged by the cities of Montreal and nearby Longueuil, Que. violated provincial legislation that set tax hikes at a maximum of five per cent.
“The class action is not an appropriate procedure for seeking to quash a municipal bylaw,” Justice Louis LeBel wrote for the majority in the appeals of Marcotte and Usinage Pouliot, both from communities on Montreal’s south shore that merged into the City of Longueuil.
Under provincial law, merged cities were allowed to raise taxes in boroughs that were paying relatively lower rates by five per cent annually until the rates evened out. Longueuil maintained that it abided by the five per cent ceiling, but that it was forced to add new, separate charges to the tax bill for things such as improving police and fire services.
In 2006, the communities in questioned separated from Longueuil after voting to de-merge.
In a separate decision, the Supreme Court also rejected the appeal of Breslaw, a resident of Westmount, which became part of the City of Montreal and has since gained its autonomy.
Breslaw said he was seeking class-action certification to retrieve property tax overpayments in 2004 and 2005.
http://www.canada.com/court+quashes+appeals+Quebec+municipal+taxpayers/2081766/story.html

OTTAWA – The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeals Thursday of three municipal taxpayers who wanted to launch class-action lawsuits to force city hall to reimburse millions of dollars that it collected in taxes.

By a 5-4 margin, the court sided with the lower courts in Quebec by rejecting the cases of Michel Marcotte, Usinage Pouliot Inc., and Jon Breslaw.

The rate payers argued the municipal levy charged by the cities of Montreal and nearby Longueuil, Que. violated provincial legislation that set tax hikes at a maximum of five per cent.

“The class action is not an appropriate procedure for seeking to quash a municipal bylaw,” Justice Louis LeBel wrote for the majority in the appeals of Marcotte and Usinage Pouliot, both from communities on Montreal’s south shore that merged into the City of Longueuil.

Under provincial law, merged cities were allowed to raise taxes in boroughs that were paying relatively lower rates by five per cent annually until the rates evened out. Longueuil maintained that it abided by the five per cent ceiling, but that it was forced to add new, separate charges to the tax bill for things such as improving police and fire services.

In 2006, the communities in questioned separated from Longueuil after voting to de-merge.

In a separate decision, the Supreme Court also rejected the appeal of Breslaw, a resident of Westmount, which became part of the City of Montreal and has since gained its autonomy.

Breslaw said he was seeking class-action certification to retrieve property tax overpayments in 2004 and 2005.

http://www.canada.com/court+quashes+appeals+Quebec+municipal+taxpayers/2081766/story.html

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

  • Tax Filing Delay Means Valentine Gift For 50 Million Taxpayers! Earlier on this site, we made the following announcement, "According to an IRS bulletin, about 50 million taxpayers will face an income tax filing delay this year. If you itemize your tax deductions, then you...
  • Self Employment Tax For those who are self employed, the self employment tax and the burden it imparts is a major stressor that can make things tense for those with their own businesses. All it takes is a...
  • P2P Lending Investors Beware: Government Layoffs & State Bankruptcy Risk Increasing Some time ago, I mentioned that P2P lending investors should no longer believe that a peer to peer lending loan to federal or state government employee is a "sure thing" or that government employees can...
  • Want to be in a Working Family? (Hard Workers with Money Need Not Apply) One of the constant battle cries of politicians running for office is that they support "working families."  Much of the political whining and hand wringing is about the "plight" of "working families."  It seems that...
  • Tax Free Bond Funds Tax free bond funds can be a great investment for anyone looking to recognize good returns on a low-risk opportunity. Long popular with wealthy investors, tax free municipal bond funds invest primarily in, you guessed...

Toronto strike savings yield property tax break

The savings recouped from Toronto’s civic workers strike will likely be put towards property tax bills next year instead of being mailed out as rebates to city residents.
The city’s executive committee recommended Monday that the estimated $33.2 million saved in the summer work stoppage be applied to next year’s operating budget.
Some city councillors had pushed for an immediate rebate.
But the city has estimated the cost of issuing and administering rebate cheques at somewhere between $2 million and $3 million.
Mayor David Miller said Monday that reflecting those savings in property tax bills is “the fairest and most efficient way” to return the money to Torontonians.
The proposal is expected to save taxpayers around 2.8 per cent on their tax bills — about $36 million — next year.
But Miller wouldn’t say if property taxes will increase in 2010, or by how much. While there are no official figures out, the city is facing a significant budget shortfall next year.
Council will vote on the executive committee’s recommendation later this month.
The 39-day strike by about 30,000 municipal employees left most residents of Canada’s largest city with no residential garbage or recycling collection. City-run daycares and summer day camps were closed, along with swimming pools and most other city services.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2009/10/05/toronto-strike-tax-savings695.html

The savings recouped from Toronto’s civic workers strike will likely be put towards property tax bills next year instead of being mailed out as rebates to city residents.

The city’s executive committee recommended Monday that the estimated $33.2 million saved in the summer work stoppage be applied to next year’s operating budget.

Some city councillors had pushed for an immediate rebate.

But the city has estimated the cost of issuing and administering rebate cheques at somewhere between $2 million and $3 million.

Mayor David Miller said Monday that reflecting those savings in property tax bills is “the fairest and most efficient way” to return the money to Torontonians.

The proposal is expected to save taxpayers around 2.8 per cent on their tax bills — about $36 million — next year.

But Miller wouldn’t say if property taxes will increase in 2010, or by how much. While there are no official figures out, the city is facing a significant budget shortfall next year.

Council will vote on the executive committee’s recommendation later this month.

The 39-day strike by about 30,000 municipal employees left most residents of Canada’s largest city with no residential garbage or recycling collection. City-run daycares and summer day camps were closed, along with swimming pools and most other city services.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2009/10/05/toronto-strike-tax-savings695.html

Property Tax Assessments to be Mailed Soon

St. Boniface Hospital Winnipeg Hotels Nearby

Winnipeg Super 8 Hotel

www.crossfireconsulting.net

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • End of Year Tax Tips 10 days remain in 2010. It's not too late to make a few moves to help your tax situation for this year and next. If you are 70-1/2 and taking RMDs (required minimum distributions) from...
  • Just won $390 Million in the Lottery? Maybe not so quick... The news is hopping with word that the $390 Mega Millions has been won.  There's always a big rush to buy tickets when the jackpot reaches these amazingly high numbers.  I never understood why.  It...
  • Golf Tournament Recap: US Tour Championship Phil Mickelson takes US Tour Championship Win, Tiger Woods Walks Away With $10 Million Dollars. Phil Mickelson managed to ge the best of Tiger Woods during the US Tour Championship, but he still saw the...
  • Where are Estate Taxes Going? The question I hear the most when I am teaching classes are, where do you think the Estate Taxes are going?  I always respond, they aren't disappearing. Period.   The current administration (along with the last one)...
  • Taxes Taxes Taxes Roundup This week starts with a personal note. I was in Austin, Texas earlier this week, and to my utter horror was told by the grill worker at a cafeteria that I could not order a...

Cut spending, Sam

The City of Winnipeg got a staggering $61 million more from the province last year than it expected, according to the Department of Intergovernmental Affairs 2008-09 annual report tabled in the legislature Thursday.
Yet we still hear Mayor Sam Katz and city council whine that they’re not getting their share of provincial and federal tax dollars.
At some point, these guys have to give their heads a shake.
The provincial government had budgeted $156 million for the city in its 2008 budget, including conditional and unconditional grants, and specific funding for areas such as road repair.
But that figure soared to $217 million by the end of the year after the province topped up funding in a number of areas. It makes a mockery of the complainers at city hall who claim they’re starved for cash and may have to raise property taxes as a result.
The province had budgeted $92 million for the city under its Building Manitoba Fund, where the province shares a percentage of income, corporate and gas taxes with the city.
That transfer grew to $97 million by the end of the year due to higher than anticipated income and fuel taxes.
The city also got a major boost in unconditional grants it receives from the province. That grant, which the city can spend however it wants, was originally set at $20 million for the year. But it was topped up to $35 million “to assist the city in meeting its budgetary pressures.” I believe that’s called a bailout.
The city got just over $1 million more in gaming money from the province than expected, for a total of $15.7 million.
They also got $15 million more than expected in capital assistance from the province, primarily to help pay for the southwest rapid transit corridor.
City hall got a windfall from Broadway for road repair. The original budget for road and bridge repair was $20 million. But the city ended up getting a $45-million jackpot instead, primarily because the province agreed to accelerate $25 million in 2009 roads funding.
There were a few other categories that didn’t change much from the original budget. But all told, the city got a $217-million windfall from the province, up 39% from what was originally budgeted.
Despite that, we still hear the usual complaints from the mayor and city council that they’re not getting their fair share of the taxation pie. And they threaten that if they don’t get more, they may have to raise property taxes.
How much more do they need?
Perhaps if they got their own spending under control they could solve whatever money problems they claim to have.
The city still hasn’t cut its bloated bureaucracy, despite claims to the contrary by Katz. In 2003, there was an average of 8,385 people on the payroll at city hall. Five years later, that number was up slightly to 8,402, according to the city’s own annual financial reports.
Worse, labour costs at the city soared 21% between 2003 and 2008, up $100 million.
The truth is, the city has a spending problem, not a revenue problem.
They should solve that first.
http://www.winnipegsun.com/news/columnists/tom_brodbeck/2009/10/04/11288126-sun.html

The City of Winnipeg got a staggering $61 million more from the province last year than it expected, according to the Department of Intergovernmental Affairs 2008-09 annual report tabled in the legislature Thursday.

Yet we still hear Mayor Sam Katz and city council whine that they’re not getting their share of provincial and federal tax dollars.

At some point, these guys have to give their heads a shake.

The provincial government had budgeted $156 million for the city in its 2008 budget, including conditional and unconditional grants, and specific funding for areas such as road repair.

But that figure soared to $217 million by the end of the year after the province topped up funding in a number of areas. It makes a mockery of the complainers at city hall who claim they’re starved for cash and may have to raise property taxes as a result.

The province had budgeted $92 million for the city under its Building Manitoba Fund, where the province shares a percentage of income, corporate and gas taxes with the city.

That transfer grew to $97 million by the end of the year due to higher than anticipated income and fuel taxes.

The city also got a major boost in unconditional grants it receives from the province. That grant, which the city can spend however it wants, was originally set at $20 million for the year. But it was topped up to $35 million “to assist the city in meeting its budgetary pressures.” I believe that’s called a bailout.

The city got just over $1 million more in gaming money from the province than expected, for a total of $15.7 million.

They also got $15 million more than expected in capital assistance from the province, primarily to help pay for the southwest rapid transit corridor.

City hall got a windfall from Broadway for road repair. The original budget for road and bridge repair was $20 million. But the city ended up getting a $45-million jackpot instead, primarily because the province agreed to accelerate $25 million in 2009 roads funding.

There were a few other categories that didn’t change much from the original budget. But all told, the city got a $217-million windfall from the province, up 39% from what was originally budgeted.

Despite that, we still hear the usual complaints from the mayor and city council that they’re not getting their fair share of the taxation pie. And they threaten that if they don’t get more, they may have to raise property taxes.

How much more do they need?

Perhaps if they got their own spending under control they could solve whatever money problems they claim to have.

The city still hasn’t cut its bloated bureaucracy, despite claims to the contrary by Katz. In 2003, there was an average of 8,385 people on the payroll at city hall. Five years later, that number was up slightly to 8,402, according to the city’s own annual financial reports.

Worse, labour costs at the city soared 21% between 2003 and 2008, up $100 million.

The truth is, the city has a spending problem, not a revenue problem.

They should solve that first.

http://www.winnipegsun.com/news/columnists/tom_brodbeck/2009/10/04/11288126-sun.html

Surrey Coquitlam Vancouver Victoria Auto Financing Interest Rates

www.crossfireconsulting.net

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

  • Where are Estate Taxes Going? The question I hear the most when I am teaching classes are, where do you think the Estate Taxes are going?  I always respond, they aren't disappearing. Period.   The current administration (along with the last one)...
  • Year End Income Tax Guide (Part 2) This is the second part of Mr. ToughMoney Love's year end income tax guide that I have put together to help me (and I hope you) do some last minute strategizing and planning for the 2008 and...
  • Looking For Your Last Year Tax Return? If you need your tax return information from a previous year, you can request it from the IRS.  Taxpayers have the option of requesting either a tax return transcript or a tax account transcript. Here...
  • Tax Loss Harvesting Advice... From My Accountant According to my friends, I'm one of those people who has "a guy" for everything. I have a guy who does my car maintenance, a guy who helps me maintain this blog, and occasionally a...
  • It Pays More To Have a Side Gig If You Make More Money I'm a strong believer in having a side gig. There are lots of benefits including extra income and security should something bad happen at work, but it's clear to me that having a side gig...

Beware: Authorities say scammers get more crafty

Con artists are getting more creative and people are falling prey to new scams each day.
Law enforcement officials recommend never giving out personal information and always doing research before handing over any money.
“Unfortunately these people are getting more clever,” said Jane Koskela, Tuolumne County Sheriff’s Community Service Unit volunteer. “There’s a jillion of them out there.”
“Never, ever, ever give out personal information,” said Sgt. Dave Seawell, Calaveras County Sheriff’s spokesman.
When a young man recently called Sonora resident Barbara Davis, pretending to be her grandson, and called her “Grandma,” she knew something was up.
Davis was already wise to the shake-down after a friend received the same kind of call a week earlier and was almost a victim.
The scam goes typically like this — a young man will call pretending to be your grandson or nephew, but won’t give his name. He’ll say he’s in jail in Canada and needs you to wire him money for bail.
“He wouldn’t give his name, so I already knew it was a scam and gave him a fictitious name. I strung him along hoping to get more information to give to the police,” Davis said. “I knew I’d never be taken in by this because my grandson doesn’t call me ‘Grandma.’ ”
Davis agreed to send the $2,100 to the imposter and his so-called “attorney” then called to give her the information on where to send the money.
Davis asked for the lawyer’s number, but he refused to give it, giving an excuse about office hours being over.
Sonora Police Chief Mark Stinson recommends people who receive these kinds of calls to call another relative to verify the “grandson” actually is in Canada or wherever they claim to be.
“Don’t freely go down to Western Union,” Stinson said, adding that once wired, the window to get the money back is very limited.
Stinson said if the con artist gives a phone number to an alleged jail or lawyer, then look up the real number and double check all information.
“Most of these people when you ask them pinpointed questions, they get nervous and hang up,” Stinson said.
“Don’t feed them information. They try to make you feel bad that you can’t recognize your own grandson’s voice,” Davis said of the scammer waiting for her to say a name first. “I just hope to save other people from grief.”
Another popular scam is unsolicited letters saying you’ve won a large cash prize, but you can only collect it by cashing a money order or cashier’s check and sending the money back to the person or entity, who will then send you the large lump sum.
A letter came in the mail to Sonora resident Mike Speer’s wife, Kimberly. It included a check that was fraudulent for $2,500, that they were to cash and then send back so they could get their $250,000 winnings, Speer said.
Speer said the scam is especially dangerous in this down economy, where people may be tricked by something that is too good to be true.
The Speers aren’t listed in the phone book. But according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, third parties sell people’s information.
“I just want people to be aware that there are scams in our county,” Speer said. “There are so many people with financial hardships already.”
“You have to be so careful … And I feel sorry for elderly people who are alone … at the mercy of these people,” Davis said.
Another scam is targeting people in relation to their property taxes. According to a press release from the state Attorney General’s Office, companies are sending out deceptive mailers to homeowners offering help in reducing property tax assessments, if the homeowner pays the company hundreds of dollars in fees.
However, property tax reassessment is a free service provided by county tax assessors.

Con artists are getting more creative and people are falling prey to new scams each day.

Law enforcement officials recommend never giving out personal information and always doing research before handing over any money.

“Unfortunately these people are getting more clever,” said Jane Koskela, Tuolumne County Sheriff’s Community Service Unit volunteer. “There’s a jillion of them out there.”

“Never, ever, ever give out personal information,” said Sgt. Dave Seawell, Calaveras County Sheriff’s spokesman.

When a young man recently called Sonora resident Barbara Davis, pretending to be her grandson, and called her “Grandma,” she knew something was up.

Davis was already wise to the shake-down after a friend received the same kind of call a week earlier and was almost a victim.

The scam goes typically like this — a young man will call pretending to be your grandson or nephew, but won’t give his name. He’ll say he’s in jail in Canada and needs you to wire him money for bail.

“He wouldn’t give his name, so I already knew it was a scam and gave him a fictitious name. I strung him along hoping to get more information to give to the police,” Davis said. “I knew I’d never be taken in by this because my grandson doesn’t call me ‘Grandma.’ ”

Davis agreed to send the $2,100 to the imposter and his so-called “attorney” then called to give her the information on where to send the money.

Davis asked for the lawyer’s number, but he refused to give it, giving an excuse about office hours being over.

Sonora Police Chief Mark Stinson recommends people who receive these kinds of calls to call another relative to verify the “grandson” actually is in Canada or wherever they claim to be.

“Don’t freely go down to Western Union,” Stinson said, adding that once wired, the window to get the money back is very limited.

Stinson said if the con artist gives a phone number to an alleged jail or lawyer, then look up the real number and double check all information.

“Most of these people when you ask them pinpointed questions, they get nervous and hang up,” Stinson said.

“Don’t feed them information. They try to make you feel bad that you can’t recognize your own grandson’s voice,” Davis said of the scammer waiting for her to say a name first. “I just hope to save other people from grief.”

Another popular scam is unsolicited letters saying you’ve won a large cash prize, but you can only collect it by cashing a money order or cashier’s check and sending the money back to the person or entity, who will then send you the large lump sum.

A letter came in the mail to Sonora resident Mike Speer’s wife, Kimberly. It included a check that was fraudulent for $2,500, that they were to cash and then send back so they could get their $250,000 winnings, Speer said.

Speer said the scam is especially dangerous in this down economy, where people may be tricked by something that is too good to be true.

The Speers aren’t listed in the phone book. But according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, third parties sell people’s information.

“I just want people to be aware that there are scams in our county,” Speer said. “There are so many people with financial hardships already.”

“You have to be so careful … And I feel sorry for elderly people who are alone … at the mercy of these people,” Davis said.

Another scam is targeting people in relation to their property taxes. According to a press release from the state Attorney General’s Office, companies are sending out deceptive mailers to homeowners offering help in reducing property tax assessments, if the homeowner pays the company hundreds of dollars in fees.

However, property tax reassessment is a free service provided by county tax assessors.

The Tuolumne County Sheriff’s Office Community Service Unit plans to offer “Senior Scambuster Kits,” filled with information on hiring contractors, paying for funeral expenses, sweepstakes, lotteries, prizes and gifts, and how to make informed decisions on healthcare offers, etc.
The kit is from the California Department of Consumer Affairs. To contact the Sonora CSU office, call 536-9828. To reach their scam hotline, call 588-1221.
The Calaveras County Sheriff’s Department Community Services Unit offers information on fraud and detecting bad checks and counterfeit currency and identity theft.
To contact the Community Service Unit, call Pat Ross at 754-6029.
Law enforcement cannot do much unless someone has actually been victimized. However, all scam reports are forwarded to the FBI, Stinson said.
Prosecuting the con artists can be tricky, as the majority are outside the United States.
“About 99.9 percent of the time, they’re outside of the country,” Stinson said, adding that the majority are in Africa, Europe and now, some in Canada.
“If they have the Internet, they can research some of these scams. That’s where I’d start,” Seawell said.
If a person still has concerns, “I would recommend they call their local law enforcement agency,” Seawell said.
http://www.uniondemocrat.com/2009100297994/News/Local-News/Beware-Authorities-say-scammers-get-more-crafty
Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • Update on the Attorney Meeting In a previous post updating my oil investing, I mentioned I was going to see an attorney.One of my partners [with whom I've deal a couple of smaller real estate deals] and I met for...
  • Good Reading This Past Week Mrs Micah offers up an interesting spin on the John and Kate breakup. asking Would You Give Up a Job for Your Marriage? On ChristianPF, Brandon Johnson review's the book Nobody Wants a Million Dollars....
  • Collecting Money World Wide There are several money collectors here in the United States and around the globe. There are even some people who make special trips to other parts of the world just for the purpose of collecting...
  • Saving Money The Right Way Many people end up spending money they simply do not have, or not saving nearly as much money as they should be saving. Do you feel that this is true about yourself? There are a...
  • Why Didn't Anyone Teach Me This Review [/caption] It's not often that I do a book review. Though it seems that at least once a month some author's marketing team sends me a new book, I almost never get around to them....

Reject city’s land deal, residents of Rosser told

GROSSE ISLE — Rosser residents were urged Thursday night to reject a financial offer from the City of Winnipeg for a chunk of the rural municipality’s land within the Perimeter Highway.
Former Rosser councillor Jack Oatway told a meeting that the rural community has reached a pivotal point in its history and their decision will have implications for more than a generation.
“This is your municipality,” Oatway said as he received strong applause from the 200 residents who crowded into the small Grosse Isle Memorial Hall.
Winnipeg wants the land west of Brookside Boulevard and north of Four Mile Road to allow a single municipality to deal with CentrePort Canada, the inland port and commercial development planned to augment Richardson International Airport.
Most of the airport site lies within the city of Winnipeg, except the northern tip of the main north-south runway. When CentrePort was conceived, the intention was to have one municipality handle the complex task of creating a large development that combines private-sector investment with new government-financed roads and bridges. Winnipeg said it would cost $40 million to extend water and sewer services to the new development, but it wants the land brought within the city’s boundaries.
Consultant Bob Brown told the meeting that Winnipeg negotiators had rejected any suggestion of extending water and sewer services to Rosser land for the CentrePort project or jointly administering the land.
Brown said Winnipeg made only one offer: In exchange for Rosser agreeing to present a joint annexation proposal to the Manitoba Municipal Board, the city would give the RM $5.43 million over 10 years, plus a share of new property tax revenue associated with the CentrePort development over the next 15 years.
Brown said the land Winnipeg wants amounts to about 44 square kilometres, about 10 per cent of Rosser’s land base that holds 15.6 per cent of its population and generates 38 per cent of its property tax revenue.
Brown said the deal from the city would compensate Rosser for loss of the property tax base — $543,677 a year for 10 years — plus Winnipeg would share a percentage of the new tax revenue developed on the former Rosser lands for 15 years.
Rosser has already rejected a verbal offer from the city and it has not responded to a written offer made in 2008.
Rosser Reeve Alice Bourgoin said she wanted to hear from the residents on what council should do.
“Now you see the hand we’ve been dealt,” Bourgoin said following Brown’s presentation.
Resident Ernie Futros, who lives on Rosser land close to the airport, said he believes property taxes for homeowners and businesses will multiply three to 10 times once the area becomes part of the city.
Futros said Winnipeg is being too ambitious in wanting all of the Rosser land within the Perimeter, adding a good chunk of that land isn’t slated to be developed for decades.
“I understand why they need the land for the airport, but the rest is just B.S.,” Futros said.
Futros said the Rosser council should allow all residents to vote on the offer from the city.
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/reject-citys-land-deal-residents-of-rosser-told-63232562.html

GROSSE ISLE — Rosser residents were urged Thursday night to reject a financial offer from the City of Winnipeg for a chunk of the rural municipality’s land within the Perimeter Highway.

Former Rosser councillor Jack Oatway told a meeting that the rural community has reached a pivotal point in its history and their decision will have implications for more than a generation.

“This is your municipality,” Oatway said as he received strong applause from the 200 residents who crowded into the small Grosse Isle Memorial Hall.

Winnipeg wants the land west of Brookside Boulevard and north of Four Mile Road to allow a single municipality to deal with CentrePort Canada, the inland port and commercial development planned to augment Richardson International Airport.

Most of the airport site lies within the city of Winnipeg, except the northern tip of the main north-south runway. When CentrePort was conceived, the intention was to have one municipality handle the complex task of creating a large development that combines private-sector investment with new government-financed roads and bridges. Winnipeg said it would cost $40 million to extend water and sewer services to the new development, but it wants the land brought within the city’s boundaries.

Consultant Bob Brown told the meeting that Winnipeg negotiators had rejected any suggestion of extending water and sewer services to Rosser land for the CentrePort project or jointly administering the land.

Brown said Winnipeg made only one offer: In exchange for Rosser agreeing to present a joint annexation proposal to the Manitoba Municipal Board, the city would give the RM $5.43 million over 10 years, plus a share of new property tax revenue associated with the CentrePort development over the next 15 years.

Brown said the land Winnipeg wants amounts to about 44 square kilometres, about 10 per cent of Rosser’s land base that holds 15.6 per cent of its population and generates 38 per cent of its property tax revenue.

Brown said the deal from the city would compensate Rosser for loss of the property tax base — $543,677 a year for 10 years — plus Winnipeg would share a percentage of the new tax revenue developed on the former Rosser lands for 15 years.

Rosser has already rejected a verbal offer from the city and it has not responded to a written offer made in 2008.

Rosser Reeve Alice Bourgoin said she wanted to hear from the residents on what council should do.

“Now you see the hand we’ve been dealt,” Bourgoin said following Brown’s presentation.

Resident Ernie Futros, who lives on Rosser land close to the airport, said he believes property taxes for homeowners and businesses will multiply three to 10 times once the area becomes part of the city.

Futros said Winnipeg is being too ambitious in wanting all of the Rosser land within the Perimeter, adding a good chunk of that land isn’t slated to be developed for decades.

“I understand why they need the land for the airport, but the rest is just B.S.,” Futros said.

Futros said the Rosser council should allow all residents to vote on the offer from the city.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/reject-citys-land-deal-residents-of-rosser-told-63232562.html

Winnipeg

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

  • Poplar Creek Golf Course Poplar Creek Golf Course is located in: San Mateo, CA Phone: 650-522-7510 Website: http://www.poplarcreekgolf.com/ Course History: This is an incredibly fun course to play and is challenging enough for pros while still being enjoyable for...
  • Meaford has surplus By Chris Fell - The Municipality of Meaford had a $600,000 surplus in 2009 thanks in part to some warm weather and well-behaved residents. In a year-end budget variance report, staff told council that they...
  • Baked Brie There are times that we are served something in a restaurant or friend's house and it looks tough to make, but once you do it, you have to laugh at its simplicity. This is one...
  • Passive Income With Tax Free Municipal Bonds Tax Free Municipal Bonds, once almost exclusively the domain of the rich, have gotten a lot more attention from the middle class lately.  As it turns out, you don't have to be in the top...
  • Much Needed Beach Vacation [/caption] My family has always taken family vacations to the beach, we have done so for as long as I can remember. Some of my favorite memories of my family are from our vacations. This...