Days of low-interest borrowing may soon end in Canada, economic leaders say

Canada’s economic leaders are worried that low interest rates are luring consumers into amassing huge amounts of debt that they may not be able to pay back when interest rates rise from their historic low levels.

Canada’s central bank lending rate is 0.25 percent. Mortgage rates are about 4.5 percent, while five-year consumer loan rates for items such as automobiles are about 8 percent.

Recently, Canada’s Finance Minister Jim Flaherty and the governor of the country’s central bank, Mark Carney, have sent warning signals that the days of low-interest borrowing may soon end.

Their statements show that the Canadian government is afraid that Canadians will default on the loans that are used to buy homes. About 70 percent of Canadian families own their houses, and real estate makes up the bulk of the assets of typical Canadian families.

Besides, Canadians, especially those who have not saved for their retirement or do not have a workplace pension, see home ownership as a way of locking away money until their retirement, using the money from their house sales to top up their small government pensions.
Still, most Canadians must borrow the bulk of the money they use for home purchases. Most are content to assume this large debt if the cost of the monthly payments is comparable to rent charges, and if house prices continue to rise.

In the past decade, the government has allowed the term of mortgages to be extended from a maximum of 25 years to 35 years, and has permitted its home loan insurance agency, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, to sell insurance on loans with a down payment of only a 5-percent.

The system has worked to stimulate house construction, but analysts worry that it has created a speculative bubble that may burst, allowing house prices to settle back to a level that will leave many families owing more than their homes are worth. If that happens, the national government, already running a massive annual deficit, would be stuck with the loans of Canadians who defaulted.

Last year, Canadian resale house prices rose by more than six times the rate of inflation. Interest rates have also been kept low to stimulate borrowing for capital investment.

However, the rates will probably have to rise if Canada’s national government, its provinces and cities hope to sell bonds in a market already flooded with U.S. government debt.

In an interview broadcast this week on the country’s largest private television network, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty warned Canadian families that the days of easy home ownership debt may becoming to an end.

“If we see further evidence that there is excessive demand in the housing market or that there’s an indication that people are taking on obligations that they will not be able to handle in the future when interest rates rise, then we will take some action,” Flaherty said on CTV television.

“The likely action we will take is to increase the size of the down payment from 5 percent to a higher number, reduce the amortization — bring it down from 35 years to something less,” he said.

Canadian families traditionally saw home ownership as a sign of financial security. Prices have rarely fallen in the past century. When they have, the values quickly recovered. Last year, house prices rose an average of about 20 percent, while the official inflation rate is less than 3 percent.

The average Canadians have increased their personal debt by more than 1,000 Canadian dollars (about 955 U.S. dollars) in the first half of 2009, driving up the nation’s personal debt by 44 billion Canadian dollars (42 U.S. dollars).

However, Canadians gamble on interest rates. In the early 1960s,a time of low inflation, interest rates were comparable to today’s. In the fall of 1981, with inflation near 15 percent, mortgage rates reached 20 percent.

On a 300,000 Canadian dollars (287,000 U.S. dollars) debt, which is not unusual in a major urban market, a 20 percent interest payment would amount to more than a typical Canadian family earns, after taxes, in a year. Even a 12 percent rate, which was typical of the 1980s, would generate a monthly payment of more than 3,000 Canadian dollars (2,865 U.S. dollars).

On top of those charges, Canadians must pay property taxes and most mortgage companies require the house to be insured for its full value.
Flaherty said recent price increases for homes in Canada are due to a “confluence” of factors including low interest rates, an improving economic outlook and a stabilizing job market.

On Dec. 10, Mark Carney, the governor of Canada’s central bank, warned that Canadian families were becoming more vulnerable to interest rate fluctuations because they have added debt this year while other countries such as the United States and Britain have seen reductions in personal debt-to-income ratios. The bank echoed the warnings of several non-government economists who warn that the Canadian rush to indebtedness is unsustainable.

In the Bank of Canada’s semi-annual report, Carney wrote: “House
holds need to assess their ability to service these debt obligations over their entire maturity, taking into account likely changes in both income and interest rates.

“Financial institutions need to carefully consider the aggregate risk to their entire portfolio of household exposures when evaluating even an insured mortgage, since a household defaulting on an insured mortgage would likely be unable to meet its other debt obligations.”

Carney warned that the risk to Canadian banks is relatively low, but up to 10 percent of households would face serious problems meeting their house payments if interest rates rise.

However, Benjamin Tal, an economist with the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, a major mortgage lender, said Canadians find ways of hanging onto their houses when interest rates fluctuate, and tend to default only when they have lost their jobs.

Still, Tal said, “It is time for both borrowers and lenders to exercise prudence in continuing to build up household debt loads to the point where they are overly reliant on today’s low rates.”

Surrey Coquitlam Vancouver Victoria Auto Financing Interest Rates
BBB Review of Furnasman
Crossfireconsulting Blog

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • United States at a Crossroads On August 6th 2011, the United States made history by losing S&P's perfect AAA credit rating. We have held the perfect credit rating since 1941, 70 years of supremacy. The United States is at a...
  • The Economic Dangers When Banks Can't Collect Fantastic real estate and banking article in The New York Times today entitled Borrowers Refuse to Pay Billions in Home Equity Loans regarding the fallout of America's popped real estate bubble: Each deal financed the...
  • 7 Ways to Consolidate Debt. [/caption] Debt happens. It happens to everyone from college students to seasoned workforce veterans struck by sudden illness and a loss of income. Sometimes it isn't how you got into debt that matters most, but...
  • Balance Transfer: What Is It And How Can It Work In Your Favor? [The following is a guest post from Compare Cards. They have an extensive list of balance transfer cards on their website.] A balance transfer is a transaction in which you pay off one loan with...
  • What Is Jim Rogers Buying Now? A couple of days ago, legendary investor, commodity bull and one-time partner of George Soros, Jim Rogers, was interviewed by Betty Liu of Bloomberg's Singapore office. It seems that Jim Rogers is also of the...

Vancouver real estate, buying into the million dollar hype.

Buying into the Real Estate Hype could put you down and out.
Vancouver, is touted as one of the best cities to live in the world.

Many in society are wondering, is it?

One mantra that has inflamed many is; “British Columbia, the best place on earth”.

Who spreads these mantras?

The politician no doubt, looking to either spread their mantra to the world as a source of pride or perhaps to get British Columbian’s to buy into it?

The federal government of Canada’s Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is looking to clamp down on home mortgage regulations, what many think as a safeguard for Canadians in debt.

Perhaps this mortgage regulation is geared to prevent a possible mirroring of a U.S. housing meltdown, Canadian style. The Bank of Canada have stated many Canadians are stretched to the limit financially.

The real estate industry, particularily British Columbia, counter that these regulations will be a detriment to Canadians. Of course, some see this as those in the Realty industry once again spreading fear and hype, as certainly this may be seen as a slight against potential commissions on their part.

One wonders how this could be a detriment to Canadians? Perhaps an answer can be found if one looks further into the British Columbia Realty industry hype we have all read in the media.

Perhaps a political move is underfoot against this federal ruling? Who is to say? Perhaps a musing by some looking for answers why this ruling is good or bad. This question is for whom?

Could real estate hype begininning with the “Best place to Live in the world” or “Vancouver, one of the best cities in the world to live” fuel real estate speculation?

Many wonder if a reality check is in order as to why house prices have skyrocketed in the last decade? One example of many, is a 1,000 square foot single family home in downtown Vancouver, off Manitoba Street and 14th Avenue went for $300,000.00 in 1999. Granted, it was a 40 year old fixer upper, but certainly not out of reach for a handyman with basic tools.

Not to spread rumour and innuendo, but it is said in the summer of 2009, that same house which has changed little, located on Manitoba and 14th Street was to be sold in the spring of 2010 and expected to reach between $1,500,000.00 to $2,000,000. Hmmm, certainly a handsome profit for the homeowner, especially if a bidding war amongst purchasers ensues.

Median salaries have not gone up accordingly, real estate and property taxes have gone up exponentially, so what is the mystery? Supply and demand? Hype? Perhaps a bit of both.

Real estate in British Columbia, particularly Vancouver and surrounding regions as far as Hope, BC have many wondering, if British Columbia is the best place in the world, it seems, anyone who can truly afford a single family home within the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD), especially Vancouver and nearby burgs better have a million dollars on hand.

Condos costing up wards of a half million dollars for 400 square feet of living space, if you can call it living, could buy a mansion in many parts of Canada. Point Roberts, Washington. U.S.A., close to the ocean, sharing a border with British Columbia have 1,200 square foot homes at half the cost of around $200,000. Funny, when you think of it, if not being a U.S. city, but being part of British Columbia and a 20 minute to Richmond, BC, these same water view properties would be in the two million dollar range. Can you see the hype?

Outside the GVRD a nearly new 1,200 square foot modest home can be had for around $200,000 in Hope, British Columbia. If you work in the GVRD and live in Hope, BC, the monthly travel expenses will equal or surpass your monthly mortgage payment. Certainly not a feasible way to get into the housing market.

Most British Columbian’s with a modest dual income can enter the realm of the millionaire, but are forced to live far beyond their means, resulting in a cash poor-house rich lifestyle.

It’s been said some homeowners sometimes have to make a choice of food and clothing over housing payments, some choose housing. People buy into the hype Realtors (“Fear Mongering”) love to spread “Buy now, cause they are not making any more land!”

Setbacks, such as job loss, divorce, sickness, car or home repair, a rise in interest rates, will put many in dire financial straits. Certainly, homes built with in law suites can be a warning sign for many, as Realtors gleefully chime as a way for the homeowner to get into the real estate game. The problems with this are self explanatory. Your tenant loses their job, good luck trying to evict them, there are laws in British Columbia to prevent this.

A rise in property value can mean an increase in monthly payments, world events in economy as we have witnessed cause changes in financial fortunes for everyone. Prime Minister Harper once stated, all is getting better now, but Canadians should not be too smug. No truer words spoken.

Financial advisers warn of economic shifts which could happen if mortgage rates climb a percent or so. A rise of a percentage point could bankrupt many cash poor, house rich homeowners. The question then would be, how would this affect friendly Realtor? Most likely counting their commission on your home, winners regardless if you lose your home.

Beautiful British Columbia may still be the best place in the world, but for some, British Columbia maybe wearing too much rouge, applied by a political makeup artist looking to protect their own kind and maintaining the hype all too clear for the many, but lost in translation when it comes to affordable housing.

http://english.cctv.com/20091228/103435.shtml

Furnasman One Hour Air Filters
One Hour Winnipeg Canada
Boonstraonehour
Crossfireconsulting Blog

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • Tips for Buying Foreclosures According to RealtyTrac, foreclosure notices in October have increased by only one percent since the previous month. Although the past year has seen a steady decrease in the number of filings, it’s still a market...
  • 5 Lessons Potential Home Buyers Can Learn from Median Income vs Median Home Price The NY Times recently published a very powerful interactive graphic comparing median income vs. median home prices from a wide selection of American cities dating back to 1979. At first glance, it really does appear...
  • Self Storage Seminar Spent 6 hours this weekend at a self-storage mini-seminar. The speaker, Cory Donaldson was pretty good. He started buying real estate 15 years ago. He bought a duplex, then a four-plex and eventually starting buying...
  • Commercial Real Estate Articles and News # 2 Howdy from the metropolis of Cedar Crest, New Mexico! We are now...what I call "The Dry Season." No...I am not talking about the economy....and..No...I am not talking about the lack of rain in Northern New...
  • Planning For Retirement Late in Life Not all of us have had the luxury of spending the last 20 years to secure our financial future. Most of the time, through no fault of our own, putting aside money for retirement takes...

Don’t ‘offload’ Decficit Deficits Cities Muncipalities State

Federation of Municipalities asks all party leaders to adopt plan that protects property taxpayers

OTTAWA–Canada’s towns and cities are seeking assurances that Ottawa won’t eliminate its $55.9 billion deficit on the backs of local homeowners.

The Federation of Canadian Municipalities has written to the four federal party leaders asking each of them to commit to a deficit strategy that protects property taxpayers and spares them big tax hikes.

“All parties in Parliament must commit to ruling out direct and indirect offloading as a deficit-fighting measure,” wrote Basil Stewart, president of the association and the mayor of Summerside, P.E.I.

That commitment should include preserving programs that fund municipal infrastructure and services and preventing the transfer of tax burdens from one level of government to another.

With the effects of the recession appearing to soften, attention is turning to how the government will stem the tide of red ink and restore coffers to surplus.

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has pledged that his deficit plan won’t mean cutting transfer payments.

But he’s also warned that curbing federal spending will mean “tough choices.”

That’s why the municipalities are taking the pre-emptive step.

Still fresh in the memories of many local politicians is the deficit fight of the 1990s, when Ottawa’s cost-cutting efforts sparked a domino effect of “downloading” that left towns and cities saddled with new responsibilities and no new revenue stream to pay for them.

“In the end many had no choice to but raise property taxes,” Stewart wrote in his letter, a copy of which was obtained by the Star.

It was during that time that infrastructure projects were delayed due to a lack of cash, and municipalities struggled with costly new obligations such as social housing and immigrant settlement.

“Within a few years, federal and provincial/territorial governments had eliminated their budget deficits and were posting record-setting budget surpluses, but property taxpayers were left paying for a growing list of municipal responsibilities,” Stewart wrote.

That’s exactly what municipalities want to avoid this time, he said.

“Offloading is a property tax hike in disguise,” Stewart said in his letter, which was sent to the party leaders yesterday.

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/701463

Property Tax Assessments to be Mailed Soon

www.crossfireconsulting.net

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • Death and Taxes; Why Not Tax Death? "The only things certain in life are death and taxes."  There are few guarantees in life, but these are two of them; you will die at some point (hopefully, not soon), and you will have...
  • How to Appeal Your Property Taxes Property taxes are one of the principal means that cities and municipalities use to raise revenue. Property taxes are generally based on two things: the value of the property itself, and the local rate of...
  • Municipal Bond Funds: The Easiest Way to Find Tax Free Investments. Nothing like a terrible year in the stock market to bring back the most boring investment choice out there... bonds! As an active investor, the very thought of bonds makes me drowsy.  All they do,...
  • Taxes Suck! (And so does Aurora Loan Services) I hate taxes. And I hate filing them For one I feel the government doesn't know how to properly utilize the money it gets. Unlike Australia, where the budget is in a state of constant...
  • The Fair Tax Will Hurt The States Before the Fair Tax advocates attack me as being uninformed, first let me tell you I am actually for the Fair Tax, or at least some form of consumption tax instead of the current income...